Back to blog
Comparison, Ruptela, Pro5 Lite, Spider IoT, CAN Bus, GPS Tracker, Telematics, Event Engine, WiFi, BLE, Mokosmart
ES • EN • PT

Ruptela Pro5 Lite vs Rinho Spider IoT: GPS Tracker Comparison 2026

Ruptela Pro5 Lite vs Rinho Spider IoT Comparison

👉 Who this article is for: Integrators and fleet managers evaluating mid-range GPS trackers with CAN Bus for commercial operations in Latin America.

⚠️ Disclaimer: This analysis reflects our perspective as Rinho manufacturers, but with a commitment to technical honesty. There's no perfect tracker for all cases — each project has different needs. Our philosophy is to help you choose the best for your specific case, even if that means recommending another brand.

If you're evaluating mid-range GPS trackers with CAN Bus for commercial fleets, you probably have Ruptela Pro5 Lite and Rinho Spider IoT on your list. Both are solid devices, but they have fundamental differences that can impact your operation.

In this comparison, we analyze real specifications, automation capabilities, and technical support to help you make the best decision.


Quick Comparison Table

Feature Ruptela Pro5 Lite Rinho Spider IoT Advantage
Cellular connectivity LTE Cat 1 + 2G LTE Cat 1 + 2G Tie
WiFi ❌ Not available ✅ Integrated Spider
BLE for sensors BLE 5.0 BLE 5.0 Tie
GPIO 3 In + 4 Out + 2 Analog 4 DIN + 3 AIN + 3 DOUT Spider
CAN Bus 2x native CAN Native CAN (J1939, OBDII, IESCAN) See note*
Event engine ~40-80 I/O slots 196 programmable rules Spider
Backup battery 1050 mAh 500 mAh Pro5 Lite
Power supply 9-32V DC 8-38V DC Spider
Protection IP41 IP30 (indoor installation) Tie
Technical support Lithuania (English, +6h) LATAM (Spanish) Spider

CAN Bus: Profiles vs Flexibility

Note on CAN Bus: Ruptela has years of accumulated reverse engineering with an extensive database of profiles by make/model/year. If your fleet is homogeneous with common European brands (Scania, Volvo, MAN), they probably have the profile ready.

Rinho supports standard OBDII, J1939 (most commercial trucks), and IESCAN (Mercedes-Benz) out of the box. For non-standard proprietary parameters or vehicles without pre-configured profiles, CXECU allows defining custom CAN readings — a flexibility that Ruptela doesn't offer.

Summary: Ruptela wins in initial setup time for homogeneous fleets with common brands. Rinho wins in flexibility for mixed fleets, rare vehicles, or custom needs.


Event Engine: The difference that matters

This is the most significant difference between both devices, and the one that most impacts complex operations.

Ruptela Pro5 Lite uses a configurable I/O slot system. Each input or output can generate events based on hysteresis, delta, or edges. You can combine some conditions with basic AND/OR logic, but each slot operates relatively independently.

Rinho Spider IoT implements a 196 programmable rules engine where each rule can have:

  • Multiple conditions combined with AND, OR, NOT
  • No practical limit on conditions per rule
  • Multiple simultaneous actions
  • Rule chaining between rules

Practical example: Refrigerated transport

Imagine you need this logic:

IF cargo_temperature > 8°C
AND cold_compressor = OFF (via CAN)
AND vehicle_moving = YES
AND time_in_this_condition > 5 minutes
THEN
  → Activate cabin buzzer
  → Generate HIGH priority event
  → Send SMS to supervisor
  → Change report frequency to 30 seconds

In Pro5 Lite: This combined logic with multiple actions is not possible. You can monitor temperature and generate events, but you cannot combine 4 different conditions with 4 different actions in a single rule.

In Spider IoT: One rule, 5 minutes of configuration. The event engine is designed exactly for these cases.


WiFi: The unique differentiator

Rinho Spider includes integrated WiFi connectivity. No Ruptela tracker offers this.

What is WiFi useful for in a vehicle tracker?

  1. Starlink Connectivity: In rural areas of LATAM where there's no cellular coverage, the vehicle can connect to a Starlink terminal and transmit data normally.

  2. Integrated captive portal: Spider can serve a configurable web page that allows drivers to perform actions (check-in, pre-operational inspection, delivery confirmation) directly connected to the 196 rules engine.

  3. Bulk data download: In depots with WiFi, the tracker can download accumulated history without consuming mobile data.


BLE Ecosystem: Integrated wireless sensors

Spider IoT includes factory BLE 5.0 — it's not an optional accessory. It allows connecting 4 fixed wireless sensors with detailed data, plus a BSW wildcard system that expands monitoring to dozens of sensors through smart grouping. Compatible with the Mokosmart line and other standard iBeacon/Eddystone manufacturers.

Immediate applications

Sensor Application
Rinho Condition (L02S) Temperature, humidity, door opening, virtual trailer coupling
Rinho ID Band (W6) Driver identification, start control, SOS button

Success case: Virtual trailer coupling

Without cables or perforations in the fifth wheel, the system automatically detects which trailer is coupled to each tractor. When uncoupled outside an authorized geofence ? immediate alert. Read more about virtual coupling with Mokosmart.

The Rinho advantage

BLE data integrates with the 196 rules engine. You can create logic like:

IF BLE_door_sensor = OPEN
AND BLE_temperature > 8°C
AND vehicle_moving = YES
THEN → Critical alert + SMS + profile change

This is something Ruptela solves with limited predefined scenarios — not with complete programmable logic.

Need to integrate a specific sensor? Rinho's support team can adapt new BLE devices to your operation.


Technical support: The forgotten factor

Ruptela is headquartered in Vilnius, Lithuania. Technical support is available in English, with a time difference of +5/+6 hours compared to most LATAM countries. If you have a problem at 3pm in Santiago or Buenos Aires, Ruptela's support team has already finished their workday.

Rinho operates from Argentina with support in Spanish and in the same timezone as most LATAM operations.


When NOT to choose Rinho Spider

For transparency, here are cases where Ruptela may be a better option:

Situation Why choose Ruptela
Need RS232/RS485 Spider has no dedicated serial ports
Backup battery is critical Pro5 Lite has 1050 mAh vs 500 mAh
100% European fleet with known CAN Ruptela has extensive pre-configured profiles
Already have Ruptela infrastructure Maintaining operational consistency

When to choose each one?

Choose Ruptela Pro5 Lite if:

  • Your operation requires RS232/RS485 for specific sensors
  • You need maximum backup battery (1050 mAh)
  • You have a homogeneous fleet of European brands with CAN profiles already available
  • Your technical team handles English fluently

Choose Rinho Spider IoT if:

  • You need complex automations (196 rules vs limited slots)
  • You operate in rural areas where WiFi+Starlink can save your connectivity
  • You want to integrate wireless BLE sensors
  • You have mixed fleets or vehicles without pre-configured CAN profiles
  • You value technical support in Spanish and in your timezone

Conclusion

Both are capable devices, but they solve different problems. Pro5 Lite is a solid tracker with good pre-configured CAN support and battery capacity. Spider IoT offers a significantly more powerful automation engine, unique WiFi connectivity in the market, complete BLE ecosystem, and CAN flexibility with CXECU.

Have a specific project and not sure which tracker to choose? Contact us and we'll help you evaluate the best option — even if it's not Rinho.


Related articles

📖 View Spider IoT specifications | 📩 Request quote