Back to blog
Comparison, Queclink, GV350MG, Spider IoT, GPS Tracker, Telematics, Event Engine, WiFi, BLE, CAN Bus, Fleet
ES • EN • PT

Queclink GV350MG vs Rinho Spider IoT: Vehicle Trackers 2026

Queclink GV350MG vs Rinho Spider IoT Comparison

👉 Who this article is for: Integrators and fleet managers looking for vehicle GPS trackers with CAN Bus for trucks, agricultural machinery, or mixed fleets.

⚠️ Note: We are Rinho manufacturers. This analysis is based on official technical specifications from both devices. We include cases where the competitor may be a better option depending on the project.

The Queclink GV350MG is the evolution of the successful GV300 with LTE Cat 4 connectivity. It's one of the most deployed trackers in LATAM for fleet management and vehicle telematics, with strong presence in agricultural and cargo transport projects thanks to its customizable CAN interface.

The Rinho Spider IoT competes in the same segment but adds integrated WiFi (unique in its category), BLE 5.0 for wireless sensors, and a 196-rule programmable engine. Let's look at the technical differences.


Technical Comparison Table

Feature Queclink GV350MG Rinho Spider IoT Advantage
Cellular connectivity LTE Cat 4 + 3G + 2G LTE Cat 1 + 2G GV350MG
WiFi ❌ Not available ✅ 2.4 GHz integrated Spider
BLE for sensors ❌ Not available ✅ BLE 5.0 Spider
Digital inputs 5 4 GV350MG
Analog inputs 2 3 Spider
Digital outputs 3 3 Tie
1-Wire 1 port 1 port Tie
CAN Bus J1939 FMS (customizable) OBDII, J1939, EBS, IESCAN Spider
Event engine ~20 scenarios 196 programmable rules Spider
Voltage range 8-32V DC 8-38V DC Spider
Backup battery ~170 mAh 500 mAh Spider
Dimensions 106×80×26 mm 80×45×22 mm Spider
Certifications FCC, CE, E-Mark, Anatel LATAM certified Tie

Integrated WiFi: The Main Difference

The Spider IoT is the only mid-range vehicle tracker with integrated 2.4 GHz WiFi. The GV350MG doesn't offer this functionality.

Use cases where WiFi makes a difference

Fleets with rural bases: If you operate with Starlink at depots or operation bases, vehicles download accumulated data upon arrival without depending on cellular coverage.

Mass synchronization in yard: At the end of the day, all vehicles download configurations and firmware updates simultaneously via WiFi, without consuming mobile data.

Integration with local systems: The Spider can connect to industrial WiFi networks to send data to local SCADA or ERP systems in real time.


BLE 5.0: Wireless Sensors

The Spider IoT includes BLE 5.0 to connect sensors without additional wiring. The GV350MG has no Bluetooth.

Compatible sensor Application
Rinho Condition (L02S) Refrigerated cargo temperature, grain humidity
Rinho ID Band (W6) Driver identification, SOS button
Escort/Mokosmart sensors TPMS, fuel level, temperature

Use case: Agricultural transport with cargo monitoring

In harvest operations, the Spider IoT can monitor:

  • Grain temperature and humidity via BLE sensor
  • Driver identification with ID Band
  • Engine data via CAN J1939

All without additional cables in the hopper or trailer.


CAN Bus: Different Approaches

Both trackers support CAN Bus, but with different philosophies:

Queclink GV350MG:

  • Standard J1939 FMS
  • Customizable CAN interface (useful for tractors with proprietary protocols)
  • Requires external adapters for OBDII

Rinho Spider IoT:

  • Native OBDII, J1939, EBS, IESCAN
  • CXECU for custom protocols
  • No adapters required for light vehicles

When to choose each one?

Scenario Recommendation
J1939 only (standard trucks) Both work
OBDII (light vehicles) Spider - native
Tractor with proprietary CAN GV350MG - specialty
Mixed fleet (trucks + cars) Spider - more versatile

Event Engine: 20 Scenarios vs 196 Rules

Queclink GV350MG allows configuring approximately 20 scenarios with its standard configurator.

Rinho Spider IoT has a 196-rule programmable engine with combined logic (AND, OR, NOT) without nesting limits.

Example: Excessive consumption alert in loading zone

In Spider IoT:

IF speed > 0
AND geofence = "loading_zone"
AND fuel_consumed > 5L in 10min
AND engine_RPM > 2000
THEN
   Alert "Abnormal consumption in loading zone"
   Capture CAN snapshot

This rule combines GPS, geofence, CAN Bus, and consumption calculation in a single condition. With the GV350MG you would need to process this logic on the server.


Dimensions and Form Factor

Aspect GV350MG Spider IoT
Length 106 mm 80 mm
Width 80 mm 45 mm
Height 26 mm 22 mm
Format Traditional rectangular Compact

The Spider is 40% smaller, ideal for installations where space is limited (truck cabins, machinery compartments).


When to Choose Queclink GV350MG

There are scenarios where the GV350MG is the best option:

Scenario Why GV350MG
Project with John Deere/Case tractors Customizable CAN for proprietary protocols
Existing Queclink fleet Maintain ecosystem and configuration tools
LTE Cat 4 requirement Higher data throughput than Cat 1
More wired I/O needed 5 DI + 3 DO vs Spider's 4 DI + 2 DO

When to Choose Each One?

Choose Queclink GV350MG if:

  • You work with agricultural machinery with proprietary CAN
  • You already have deployed Queclink infrastructure
  • You need maximum cellular speed (LTE Cat 4)

Choose Rinho Spider IoT if:

  • You need WiFi for areas without cellular coverage
  • You want BLE sensors without wiring
  • Mixed fleets with OBDII + J1939
  • Complex automation with 196 rules
  • Limited installation space

Conclusion

The GV350MG is a solid tracker with excellent track record in LATAM, especially in agricultural projects where its customizable CAN is key. The Spider IoT stands out for:

  • Integrated WiFi - unique in its segment
  • BLE 5.0 - sensors without wiring
  • Native multi-protocol CAN - OBDII + J1939 + EBS + IESCAN
  • 196 rules - complete edge automation
  • 40% more compact - flexible installation

For mixed fleets or projects requiring WiFi connectivity and BLE sensors, the Spider IoT offers more features in less space. For agricultural projects with proprietary CAN or existing Queclink fleets, the GV350MG remains a valid option.


Need More Information?

Request a free technical evaluation - we analyze your use case and recommend the most suitable device.

📩 Contact a specialist | 📋 View Spider IoT specs


Related Articles